SABES Logo HomeSystem for Adult Basic Education SupportSystem for Adult Basic Education SupportSABES Contact Us
AssessmentCurriculumLicensureWorkforce Development & Community PlanningSABES Calendar
Administration & Organizational DevelopmentTechnologyLinks Beyond SABESStudent LeadershipResources
SABES Home> Resources> Publications> Adventures

[Adventures in Assessment logo]

Volume 10 December 1997

PDF version

CONTENTS

Introduction: Volume 10
Time to Reflect
Alison Simmons, Editor

The Connection Between Cooperative Learning and Authentic Assessment
Marta Magan-Lev

Assessment in ESOL: The Haiian Multi-Service Center Experience
Maria Kephallenou

Overcoming Cultural Barriers of a Job Interview
Judy Chau

Where's the EGAP Now?
Martha Jean

How Much and What Kind? One Family Literacy Program's Assessment Story
Sylia Greene, Nancy Hoe, Lally Stowell

What We Had to Think About Before We Could Do Portfolio Assessment
Kathy Sikes

Students Connecting with Students: Lessons in Health Care
Operation Bootstrap

NationalCenter for Adult Learning and Literacy: Assessment Research Agenda
Beth Bingham

Voices From the Field: The Basic English Skills Test (BEST)
Moira Lucey, Dulany Alexander, Babara Lippell-Paul, Rachel Donnelly

What Counts: Assessing Computer Skills
Ken Tamarkin

Learning from Experience: The TABE: Thoughts from an Inquiring Mind
Cathy Coleman

Review: Phenomenal Change: Stories of Participants in the Portfolio Project
Caroline Gear

 


Search Our Site!
 

What Counts?

Assessing Computer Skills

Kenneth Tamarkin
Project STEPS, Malden Mills, Lawrence, MA

I am currently working as an instructor at Malden Mills in Lawrence, Massachusetts in a project funded by the Corporation of Business, Work, and Learning. One of my first tasks was to design an "Introduction to Computers" class along with assessment tools that could help us place students at the appropriate level and measure both an individual's progress and the effectiveness of the class.

I wanted to develop a rubric that consisted of an even number of competency levels, since people have a tendency to go for the middle when there is an odd number. I came up with descriptions of six levels of computer use (Figure 1) ranging from never having used a computer (level 1) to basically being a computer guru (level 6). Our Introduction to Computers course was designed to serve people from levels 1,2, and 3. Each class worked best and the participants made the most efficient use of their time if the abilities of the participants differed by no more than one level. A class that was mostly level 1 could concentrate on learning how to handle a mouse and how to enter and leave programs while a class that was mostly level 3 could go into programs in more depth.

Since I was giving an assessment to as many as twenty people at once, and I am not a particularly good detective, I decided to utilize self-assessments. With each group, I walked them through the six levels of the rubric in detail, expanding on exactly what I meant by each level and emphasizing the importance of answering honestly. If a person was really level 3 and self-described herself as level 1, she might be bored in a class that spent an hour learning to handle a mouse and another hour learning to open and close programs.

We decided a few weeks later that more than 90% of the students demonstrated computer knowledge and performance in class that matched their self-assessments. Since I also wanted some objective information, I developed a short questionnaire to go along with the rubric (Figure 2) to get a sense of both computer and written language skills. If questions were answered inappropriately or not at all, I would refer the participant to our ESOL assessment process. If questions were answered with considerable sophistication, I might refer the participant to a community college program more appropriate for an advanced student than our introductory course.

I needed to develop a checklist of skills that our course would address. My first effort (Figure 3) drew upon many years of introducing computers to adults plus a month of examining the needs of workers and managers at Malden Mills by going on repeated tours of the plant and having numerous informal conversations with both workers and managers. In addition, I received the considerable assistance of my colleagues, Cindy Cook, Judy Hikes, and Johan Uvin. While both Cindy and Judy had extensive experience with adult students and had worked with computers in a classroom setting before, this was the first by time they were teaching a formal computer course. They provided a continual reality check for me and helped me from becoming too technical, while I provided the overall course outline and first draft of the assessment form, as well as technical assistance. The three of us taught a total of nine sections of the Introductory course. Two more instructors have been added in our second cycle.

While the rubric gave us a general idea of the computer expertise of our participants, the checklist gave us a far more detailed look at what students knew. In the first cycle, I gave the checklist to my students on the first day of class and had them check off the items they knew under the Pre column. But following Johan's suggestion, we changed to a rating system in which 1 meant they couldn't do the task, 2 meant they could complete the task with some prompting, and 3 meant they could do the task independently in a classroom situation. I used the new system for the first time when I worked with students to complete the "Post" column of the checklist. Since I now knew the students' computer competencies, I was able to participate in the "Post" test with them.

Our experience with the first cycle, along with getting some new capabilities on the computers, led to an expanded form (Figure 4). We added items that we were able to work on in the first cycle, or that we decided we wanted to add to the curriculum for the second cycle.

As an additional reality check whether our efforts were relevant to the needs of the workers and the workplace, my final task was to relate our Computer Assessment Scoring Guide with the National Skill Standards Project for Advanced High Performance Manufacturing (Figure 5). The National Skill Standards Project is a work-in-progress that is trying to articulate those skills needed by workers across many industries. Such standards can be used as a tool to analyze the skills needed to perform a certain job. They can also provide valuable insight for educators working with future workers.

I felt that our Computer Assessment addressed problem solving skills (PS), as well as computer skills (CU). In general, I think that determining how to use a computer to solve a new problem or complete a new task requires greater understanding than just learning how to use a particular program and being instructed when to use it. For example, it takes a greater understanding to use a computer to troubleshoot a malfunctioning machine than it does to repeatedly go through a standard procedure with a correctly functioning machine. Finally, rather than being an end in itself, at the highest level the computer becomes just one more tool in a broader process of problem solving.

Top of Page

FIGURE 1
Project STEPS

Name______________________________

Date___________________________

COMPUTER ASSESSMENT SCORING GUIDE

  1. Has never used a computer. Is very worried and uncomfortable about having to use a computer.

  2. Has used a computer at least a few times. Can turn a computer on, but understands little else. Needs considerable direction and support to handle even the most fundamental tasks. Cannot handle a mouse without difficulty.

  3. Used a computer competently in a structured work situation, but it still uncomfortable with unfamiliar applications. Can follow clear step-by-step directions, but cannot use the computer as a tool. Can use a mouse to move around the screen. Does not fully understand how programs and data differ and how they are organized, stored, and accessed.

  4. Has some experience using the computer as a tool. Can use word processing and other programs. Can learn additional programs with training. Is able to experiment and try different things out on the computer. Understands the basic structure of the computer and the difference between programs and data.

  5. Experienced and confident using the computer as a tool. Able to do troubleshooting to solve problems. Comfortable using help systems and manuals to learn how to use software. Able to determine the appropriate software to use to accomplish a task.

  6. Frequently helps others with their computer problems. Can clearly explain to others computer capabilities and functions. Can evaluate software and hardware. Tests new software and creatively uses it to improve productivity and quality.
Self-assessment score ______________

Assessment score ________________


FIGURE 2
Project STEPS

Name_________________________ Date ______________

INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTERS ASSESSMENT

  1. How do you properly turn off a computer?



  2. Do you know how to type?



  3. What is the difference between an operating system, such as Windows 95, and an application program, such as Microsoft Word?



  4. Using a mouse, how can you select something on the screen?



  5. What are you using a computer for right now?



  6. If you are not currently using a computer on your job, what do you think you might have to use a computer for in the next year?



    Assessment Score ________

Top of Page

FIGURE 3
Introduction to Computers

Individual Record for: __________________________
Class: ________________

Skill

  • Turn on computer      ___Pre ___Post
  • Correctly turn off computer      ___Pre ___Post
  • Use a mouse      ___Pre ___Post
  • Use a keyboard      ___Pre ___Post
  • Describe what makes a computer a computer      ___Pre ___Post
  • Adjust monitor      ___Pre ___Post
  • Start a program by double-clicking an icon      ___Pre ___Post
  • Start a program from the Program list or Windows Explorer      ___Pre ___Post
  • Open a document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Save a document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Close a document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Close a program      ___Pre ___Post
  • Understand the difference between a program and a document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Understand the file structure of Windows 95      ___Pre ___Post
  • Navigate the file structure of Windows 95 using Windows Explorer      ___Pre ___Post
  • Create a Microsoft Word document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Print a document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Change print options      ___Pre ___Post
  • Change screen options      ___Pre ___Post
  • Create a Microsoft Excel document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Troubleshoot by checking electrical connections      ___Pre ___Post
  • Install software      ___Pre ___Post
  • Open the system unit      ___Pre ___Post

FIGURE 4

Introduction to Computers

Individual Record for: __________________________
Class: ________________

Skill

  • Turn on computer      ___Pre ___Post
  • Correctly turn off computer      ___Pre ___Post
  • Use a mouse      ___Pre ___Post
  • Use a keyboard      ___Pre ___Post
  • Describe what makes a computer a computer      ___Pre ___Post
  • Adjust monitor      ___Pre ___Post
  • Start a program by double-clicking an icon      ___Pre ___Post
  • Start a program from the Program list or Windows Explorer      ___Pre ___Post
  • Open a document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Save a document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Close a document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Close a program      ___Pre ___Post
  • Understand the difference between a program and a document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Understand the file structure of Windows 95      ___Pre ___Post
  • Navigate the file structure of Windows 95 using Windows Explorer      ___Pre ___Post
  • Create a Microsoft Word document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Print a document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Change print options      ___Pre ___Post
  • Change screen options      ___Pre ___Post
  • Create a Microsoft Excel document      ___Pre ___Post
  • Troubleshoot by checking electrical connections      ___Pre ___Post
  • Install software      ___Pre ___Post
  • Open the system unit      ___Pre ___Post
  • Create a Microsoft Access database      ___Pre ___Post
  • Enter data in a Microsoft Access database      ___Pre ___Post
  • Select the correct software for a task      ___Pre ___Post
  • Use tutorial software      ___Pre ___Post
  • Use educational software      ___Pre ___Post
  • Find and respond to screen prompts      ___Pre ___Post
  • Confident in ability to learn computer skills and procedures      ___Pre ___Post
  • Modify screen properties      ___Pre ___Post
  • Use digital camera      ___Pre ___Post
  • Touch up and print digital pictures      ___Pre ___Post
  • Understand how a computer can control production equipment      ___Pre ___Post
  • Read a process control computer screen (i.e. Wonderware)      ___Pre ___Post
  • Use a computer to monitor and control production equipment      ___Pre ___Post

FIGURE 5

Relationship of Project STEPS
Computer Assessment Scoring Guide
with the National Skill Standards Project
for Advanced High Performance Manufacturing

A worker who scores at level 1, 2, or 3 would not meet any of the National Skill Standards.

Depending on the programs learned, a worker at Malden Mills functioning at level 4 would meet one or more of the following standards:

CU 3 List various methods of tracking inventory.
CU 5 Demonstrate use of an industry-accepted word processing software package.
CU 6 Demonstrate use of an industry-accepted spreadsheet software package.
CU 7 Demonstrate use of an industry-accepted database software package.

A worker at Malden Mills functioning at level 5 would meet all the level 4 standards plus:

CU 1 List possible computer applications in manufacturing processes.
CU 2 Identify possible effects of introducing computers into manufacturing processes.
PS 2 Apply a system of problem solving.
PS 3 Identify opportunities for applying problem solving techniques.

A worker at Malden Mills functioning at level 6 would meet all the level 5 standards plus:

PS 1 Explain the value of applying a problem solving system.

Top of Page

Originally published in Adventures in Assessment, Volume 10 (December 1997),
SABES/World Education, Boston, MA, Copyright 1997.

Funding support for the publication of this document on the Web provided in part by the Ohio State Literacy Resource Center as part of the LINCS Assessment Special Collection.

 

Boston CRC Central Northeast Southeast West
SABES is funded by Massachusetts Department of Education : :|: : Creative Commons Copyright Info.: :| : Webmaster : :| : :Site Map : : Last Modified 05/01/06