SABES Logo HomeSystem for Adult Basic Education SupportSystem for Adult Basic Education SupportSABES Contact Us
AssessmentCurriculumLicensureWorkforce Development & Community PlanningSABES Calendar
Administration & Organizational DevelopmentTechnologyLinks Beyond SABESStudent LeadershipResources
SABES Home> Resources> Publications> Adventures


[Adventures in Assessment logo]

Volume 14 Spring 2002

PDF version

CONTENTS

Introduction: Volume 14:
Examining Performance
Marie Cora, Editor

Fair Assessment Practices: Giving Students Equitable Opportunities to Demonstrate Learning
Linda Suskie

Assessing Oral Communication at the Community Learning Center: Development of the Oral Profiency Test
Joanne Hartel and Mina Reddy

So What IS a BROVI, Anyway?
And how it can change your (assessing) life?

Betty Stone and Vicki Halal

A Writing Rubric to Assess ESL Student Performance
Inaam Mansoor and Suzanne Grant

Illuminating Understanding: Performance Assessment in Mathematics
Tricia Donovan

Student Health Education Teams in Action
Mary Dubois

Involving Learners in Assessment Research
Kermit Dunkelberg

WMass Assessment Group:
Tackling the Sticky Issues

Patricia Mew and Paul Hyry

 


Search Our Site!
 

A Writing Rubric to Assess ESL Student Performance

Inaam Mansoor and Suzanne Grant

R Content/Vocabulary Organization and Development Structure Mechanics Voice

0

  • no writing
  • no comprehensible information
 

   

1

  • little comprehensible information
  • may not address question
  • limited word choice, repetitious
  • weak, incoherent
  • frequent grammatical errors
  • mostly fragments
  • 2/3 phrases/simple patterned sentences


  • lack of mechanics
  • handwriting and/or spelling obscure meaning
  • not evident

2

  • address part of the task (some but little substance) or copies from the model
  • irrelevant information
  • frequent vocabulary errors of function, choice & usage with meaning obscured

 

  • thought pattern can bedifficult to follow, ideas not connected, not
    logical
  • serious and frequent
    grammatical errors
  • meaning obscured
  • sentence structure repetitive
    (Or copies from model)

  • frequent errors
  • inconsistent use of punctuation
  • spelling may distract
    from meaning
  • invented spelling
  • not evident

3

  • addresses at least part of the task with some substance
  • limited vocabulary choice
  • occasional vocabulary errors but meaning not obscured
  • limited in appropriate
    details-insufficient amount of detail or irrelevant
    information
  • trouble sequencing
  • may indicate paragraphing
  • restricted to basic structural
    patterns (simple present,
    subject-verb), has some errors
  • correct usage of adverbials
    (because clause) and conjunctions (and/or/but)
  • goes outside of model
  • some punctuation and capitalization though frequent errors that distract
    from meaning
  • emerging voice
  • some engagement
  • some personalization

4

  • addresses the task at some length
  • begins to vary vocabulary choice
  • occasional vocabulary errors but meaning not obscured
  • uses details for support or illustration (reasons,
    contrasts)
    .but development
    of ideas is inconsistent.
    Some ideas may be well developed while others are weak
  • indicates paragraphs
  • has some control of basic structures (simple
    present/simple past)

  • attempts compound sentences
    (e.g. with and, or but, so)
  • some complex sentences
    (e.g, with when, after; before,
    while, because, if)

  • errors occasionally distract
    from meaning
  • uses periods and capitals with some
    errors
  • may use commas with compound sentences
  • mostly conventioanl spelling

 

  • shows some sense of purpose
  • some engagement
  • more personalized, may provide opinions and explanations

5

  • effectively addresses the task
  • extensive amount of information
  • varied vocabulary choice and usage although may have some errors

 

  • can write a paragraph
    with main idea and
    supporting details
  • attempts more than one paragraph and may exhibit
    rudimentary essay structure (intro, body, conclusion)
  • attempts a variety
    of structural patterns
  • some errors
  • uses correct verb tenses
  • makes errors in complex structures (passive, conditional, prsent perfect)
  • uses periods,commas, and capitals
  • most conventional spelling

 

  • authoritative, persuasive, interesting
  • emerging personal style

 

6

  • effectively addresses the task
  • substantive amount of information
  • varied and effective vocabulary usage
  • multi-paragraph with clear introduction, developement of ideas, and conclusions
  • ideas are connected
    (sequentially & logically)
  • appropriate supporting
    details
  • syntactic variety
  • well-formed sentences
  • few or no grammatical errors (verb tense markers,
    comparative and/or
    superlative)
  • appropriate
    mechanical and
    spelling
    conventions
  • authoritative
  • strongly
    reflects the
    writer's
    intellectual
    involvement
  • personal style
    is evident

 

Originally published in Adventures in Assessment, Volume 14 (Spring 2002), SABES/World Education, Boston, MA, Copyright 2002.

Funding support for the publication of this document on the Web provided in part by the Ohio State Literacy Resource Center as part of the LINCS Assessment Special Collection.

 

Boston CRC Central Northeast Southeast West
SABES is funded by Massachusetts Department of Education : :|: : Creative Commons Copyright Info.: :| : Webmaster : :| : :Site Map : : Last Modified 05/01/06