Further Adventures in Alternative Assessment: An Annotated Bibliography
(exerpt)
Don Robishaw
In this issue of Adventures in Assessment
we have taken you into the world of ongoing assessment-examining
the process and the tools and techniques practitioners use and looking
at how ongoing assessment can benefit and serve the interests of
learners as well as teachers.
Alternative assessment tools are designed and used to show what
students know, not what they do not know. Alternative assessment
is alternative because it provides choices that go beyond traditional
or standardized measurement. Alternative assessment empowers learners
and helps them become self-directed; standardized instruments may
disempower learners by assuming all of the "authority"
or by making them dependent on teachers.
Alternative assessment is ongoing and part of the curriculum, not
imposed or added on at the end. An alternative assessment component
may contain a variety of tools, including writing progress check-
lists, reading progress checklists, learning contracts, booklists,
miscue analyses, etc. Depending on their developmental level, some
learners can actually create their own self-assessment tools.
The primary purpose of alternative assessment is to assist students,
advance learning, and improve instruction. Ongoing alternative assessment
is continuous and not separated from instruction.
To support and enrich teachers' endeavors, the Research and Design
unit of SABES has compiled " Alternative Assessment: An Annotated
Bibliography. " This bibliography is intended to be a resource
to teachers who are interested in learning more about the topic
as well as those interested in using the various procedures described
in Adventures in Assessment. In the last issue of Adventures,
I reviewed several publications that related to "getting started"
with alternative assessment. This time, I have excerpted several
annotations relevant to ongoing assessment.
Sample Annotations
003 Arrastia, M., Betancourt, A. & Wang, D. (1990). Report
on Staff Development Project on AltemativeAssessment: Mothers Reading
Program. New York: America Reading Council.
This selection discusses how one adult literacy project examined
standardized testing used with its students. It proceeds from the
premise that for evaluation to be useful it must help learners to
evaluate themselves, so that they can be in full control of their
own learning. Standardized tests are often used as gates (exclusionary)
that close off certain opportunities to learners. Evaluation and
tests often contribute to learners developing a belief that they
are inadequate.
Besides the short narrative, this article also includes an appendix
containing samples from student portfolios. Items of interest in
the portfolio include teacher- and student-made tests based on student
generated text.
016 Nash, A. , McGrail, L. &others. (1989). "Our Class:
A Weekly Literacy Ritual." Talking Shop: A Curriculum Sourcebook
for Panicipatory Adult ESL. Boston: University of Massachusetts.
"Our Class" is the name of a weekly class journal which
documents the activities of a group of adult learners in Boston.
The teacher collects thoughts, quotes, factual information and anything
else of interest and writes them at the end of the week for the
class to use as a reading and writing exercise. Eventually, the
class itself compiles the journal.
The authors explain their method and discuss the importance of
ritual in the literacy classroom. Samples of "Our Class"
summaries are included.
026 Lawson, L. (1988). Record Keeping in Adult Education.
"Current Issues in Teaching ESL." Nicholas, S & Hoadley-Maidment,
E. Eds. New York: E. Arnold.
This paper discusses the theory behind keeping certain kinds of
records. It also describes some innovations in record keeping in
adult education. Record keeping has become very important in the
field of adult education in the last few years, especially since
the onslaught of alternative assessment strategies and wider recognition
of the importance of independent learning theory.
This short article is chock full of alternative record keeping tools
and instruments, as well as a brief rationale for using them. For
the "organiza- tionally challenged, " this article will
put you on the road to getting your act together.
029 Soifer, R., Irwin, M. & others. (1990) The Complete
Theory to Practice Handbook of Adult Literacy: Curriculum Design
and Teaching Ap- proaches. New York: Teacher's College Columbia
University. pp. 170-180.
The primary purpose of this chapter is to give a brief overview
of seven different ways to assess adult literacy learners' progress.
The main feature is an assessment grid that analyzes each of the
seven assessment tools that follow:
1. Booklist
2. Spelling and vocabulary graph
3. Anecdotal records (teachers)
4. Anecdotal records (students)
5. Writing assessment .
6. Reading behavior questionnaire
7. Attendance
The authors contend that all tools, including those mentioned,
should be used in ways that focus on strengths, progress, and applications
rather than weaknesses, deficiencies, and isolated skills.
Notes
As with many works which assemble a collection of readings, this
bibliography is the result of the efforts of several people--from
the development of the initial idea, to the search and collection
ofbooks and articles. I am indebted to the following people for
their assistance in this project: Loren McGrail of World Education/SABES
who supplied me with many of the resources and Joan Dixon, the Literacy
Support Initiative Coordinator. In addition the following people
acted as reviewers: Janet Kelly, Director of the Read/Write/Now
program; Janet Isserlis of the International Institute of Rhode
Island; and the following University of Massachusetts graduate students:
Michele M. Sector, Barbara Huff. Susan Schellenberger, Haleh Arbab,
Keyvan Kabastioun, and Ed Graybill.
The complete annotated bibliography contains 51 entries and will
be updated on an ongoing basis. Contributions to the collection
are welcome. Specifically we are looking for help in the next edition
of Adventures in Assessment: Looking Back. Articles and/or
annotations on student/teacher confer- ences, classroom evaluation
and program evaluation are welcome. Please contact your Regional
SABES Coordinator or Loren McGrail at World Education if you would
like to annotate some of the collected articles and/or add new ones.
Top of Page
Originally published in Adventures in Assessment,
Volume 2 (May 1992),
SABES/World Education, Boston, MA, Copyright 2003.
Funding support for the publication of this document
on the Web provided in part by the Ohio State Literacy Resource
Center as part of the LINCS
Assessment Special Collection.
|