Portfolio in Maine
Hello, Massachusetts
Sandy Brawders
Director, CALL
Center for Adult Learning and Literacy in Maine
The New England Literacy Resource Center was established to
strengthen adult literacy services in New England by promoting and
facilitating collaborations and sharing among adult literacy practitioners,
resource centers and policymakers in our region. NELRC will be doing
its job if we can turn the information flowing across our borders
form a trickle to a stream with many tributaries. Alternative assessment
is one area of great interest across New England. Clearly, we have
a lot to learn from each other.
I had the privilege to participate in the kick-off training
for Maines Horizon Project in which portfolio assessment is
central. The level of energy and enthusiasm I witnessed is a good
match to the ambitious scope of the project. Its reporting and evaluation
dimensions, in particular, tackle some of the greatest unanswered
questions about alternative assessment. I am eager to learn from
Maines experience, and I hope that we will all hear updates
on this project.
I hope this article serves as inspiration for practitioners
across New England to explore alternative assessment and to contribute
to the growing body of information and experience on the subject.
May this article mark the beginning of sustained collaboration on
alternative assessment among all New England states.
Silja Kallenbach, NELRC Coordinator
The adult education network in the
state of Maine wants to thank all the teachers for the excellent
work that you produced in the five volumes of Adventures in Assessment
that we have received. Thank you for being honest, persistent, committed,
creative, flamboyant, grounded and, above all, diverse.
All of us in Maine are hoping for a summit of assessment in the
next 12 months and all journal contributors will be sent an invitation.
I would like to thank Loren McGrail for her ability to encourage
busy practitioners to share their work for the greater good of all
adult learners. The five volumes may become a bestseller in Maine.
I am using them as the only text in an evaluation course I am teaching
through the University of Maine.
Escaping flatland is an essential task of envisioning
information for all the interesting worlds (physical, biological,
imaginary, human) that we seek to understand ar inevitably and happily
multivariate in nature. Not flatlands.
from Envisioning Information by Edward Tufte
The excitement that we want to share with you is that Maine through
its Quality Indicators has chosen portfolio assessment to replace
our standardized tests, peer evaluation as our program review, teacher-based
research to affect public policy, and a new reporting mechanism
that blends qualitative and quantitative data into a usable commodity
for program improvement.
Maine is doing what we call contex-tualized portfolio assessment.
Each adult learner, each teacher, each administrator of an adult
education program will develop a progress portfolio of their work
for the year. This portfolio will not be scored, graded, ranked,
or put in competition to beat out some other program for funding.
The purpose of the tiered portfolios that build on each other is
program improvement.
Each program in Maine is developing a baseline of who they are,
what they offer, what they have for funding, how many hours teachers
work, what services are/are not in the community to support next
steps, what barriers might be insurmountable for the adult learners
given rural issues of transportation, etc.
The baseline is the first item in everyones portfolio; the
programs will measure qualitative and quantitative progress in relation
to this baseline over a three-year period. The program measures
against itself, not in relation to a program three hours away with
four times the funding and a different population!
What counts is the articulation of action steps that can be taken
at the end of each year for the purpose of program improvement.
The steps and follow through become the basis of the self-evaluation
of a peer evaluation process that may occur every three or four
years.
In their roles, teachers see themselves change through their portfolio
depending on the people with whom they are working. Adult learners
understand their importance to improving the program for the next
year. Adult learner portfolios are only one measure of a programs
goals being reached. The yearly action plans of each program double
as their end of year report, and gives the Staff Development Team
specific instructions for prioritizing program needs.
Top of page
Through our Horizon Grant with the National Institute for Literacy,
Maine has seven regional trainers working on site with teachers,
adult learners, and administrators to create this integrated system
of assessment, evaluation, research, and reporting. Reporting will
no longer be a mystery that only administrators understand. Adult
learners and teachers will know why we need certain things and will
have the language to question whether we do need certain things!
This contextualized portfolio process gets rid of the secret language
of standardized testing results, the secret language of funding,
and the secret language of day school. This is education among peers!
Portfolio allows respect and dignity to prevail!
We are using the portfolio process as a real curriculum for developing
critical thinking skills and also as a vehicle to demonstrate transferable
skills. Some programs in Maine are using video portfolio, portfolio
on disc, audio portions, or a combination of various media. Jokes
are circulating that we want to eventually send our state report
to the federal government as a hologram showing the quantitative
and then the qualitative. I think pop-ups would also get some attention.
The real point of the humor is that technology is giving us permission
to think and display what we think differently. Yes, there are CD-ROM
life-long learning portfolios that are not just text! Technology
will change the way we perceive information. To believe that we
will not find a way to report large amounts of qualitative data
from portfolios when we have a computer with 500 megabytes of memory
is absurd. We cannot allow a lack of imagination to stop us, especially
if it means a more truthful document upon which to base the development
of public policy and funding for adult learners.
Join us in this great adventure and leave flatland behind. Reports
are meant to be read and anticipated, evaluation is meant to lead
towards exciting change, assessment is a vehicle of building self-esteem
and documenting progress, and research is a way to check standardization
and assumptions.

PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOREVER CHANGES
Content
Methodology
Evaluation
The Golden Rules
The Agreed Upon Ethical Framework for Adult Educators
-
The Adult Learner controls, owns, and designs their
own portfolio with the practitioner. It is to be portable
and transferable.
-
The learner willself-evaluate their own portfolio (progress
portfolio) and learn to seek peer evaluation of their
outcome portfolio.
-
Demonstration of progress toward the learner's long
and short term goals will take place within the portfolio.
-
Portfolio assessment models the concept of process thinking,
evaluation, sequential thinking, problem solving, data
gathering, theorizing, critiquing and contrasting ideas.
-
The completion of the outcome portfolio is a marker
in the adult learner's process of life long learning.
-
Portfolio assessment changes the role of the teacher
to that of a facilitator, researcher, consultant, peer
learner, active listener ...
-
Teacher enthusiasm must be paramount and the use of
the portfolio should develop as a daily educational ritual
with the adult learner.
-
The reporting goal of the portfolio is to thread both
quantitative and qualitative data into a more realistic
picture of adult learning through each learner, each teacher,
each program, each state.
Portfolio assessment is a vehicle for capturing
the developing educational autobiography of each adult learner. |
Top of page
This article was published in Adventures
in Assessment, Volume 6 (Spring 1994), SABES/World Education,
Boston, MA, Copyright 1994.
Funding support for the publication of this document
on the Web provided in part by the Ohio State Literacy Resource
Center as part of the LINCS
Assessment Special Collection.
|