| |
The recent crisis in adult basic education funding was
resolved favorably due to exceptional advocacy efforts by the ABE community across the
state. These recent events have a great deal to teach us about our roles and responsibilities as
practitioners in a deeply important, yet usually invisible educational arena.
Recap
Just before Thanksgiving, back in November 2001, the state budget process, long overdue,
had reached its final stage in the legislative conference committee. Dan Bosely, a state
representative from North Adams and a long-time supporter of ABE, became alarmed when he
was informed that the committee had voted to cut ABE funding in half. Bosely immediately
alerted the Department of Education, and word went out to the field through the Massachusetts
Coalition for Adult Education. Within hours, hundreds of calls from practitioners around the
state went out to state representatives, senators, and other important public figures in an attempt
to keep funding for ABE intact. These calls initiated a massive, concerted, and highly effective
advocacy effort resulting in an unusually successful restoration of 97.7 percent of proposed cuts.
Clarifications
Before reflecting on the advocacy strategy and why it was successful, it is important to
clarify some of the confusions that arose along the way. These confusions clouded peoples'
understanding of the budget process. (Note: If technical fiscal details feel too overwhelming,
please skip this section and go right to the next subhead. No one will fault you.)
First, the legislature was five months late in finalizing a state budget for FY 2002. That
means that ACLS had already spent almost 50 percent of its anticipated appropriation.
Therefore, a 50 percent cut would mean that all services would end by January 31, 2002.
Second, the figure of a 50% cut wasn't even correct. The proposed cut really represented a
44 percent cut. How did that happen? Last year, the line item appropriation for ABE was
$30.2 million. The legislature voted to increase that amount to $34 million. That's the number
that was officially recorded in the legislature's budget documents. When then-Governor Paul
Cellucci vetoed the proposed increase, the line item was back to $30 million. The legislature
never took up the override and never updated the ($34 million) on their books! When the
legislature left only $17 million in the ABE budget, they thought they were cutting 50 percent of
the budget allocation of $34 million.. However, they actually cut $13 million (30-17=13), so it
was a cut of 44 percent. Whew.
Successful Strategy
The ABE community staged an impressive, thorough campaign to restore funding.
Continual pressure -- in the form of rallies, calls, visits, letters, and emails -- convinced
legislators of the importance of ABE funding. This campaign illustrated that rallies
alone-while vibrant in their collective appeal-are not enough to get the most effective political
results. Students illustrated the importance of adult education services with life stories, putting a
human face on ABE. "You are talking about all my dreams," one student implored to his
representative. From November 29 through mid-December when the budget was amended, public
outcry continued. A volunteer public policy committee organized an effective feedback
mechanism, using email and Web sites. People were updated daily. As a result of this massive
effort, where everybody across the state did his or her part, Governor Swift, to her credit, laid the
groundwork for restoring $12.5 million to ABE through a supplemental budget she filed: First the
legislature considered restoring $10.1 million (90 percent of what we had to start the year) but
was rapidly convinced to restore the full $12.5 million (a 97.7 percent restoration!).
How the Cut Was Taken
The total cut -- 2.3 percent or $700,000 -- has been applied by DOE/ACLS across all
services: instructional, administrative, and SABES support. For equity purposes, the cut was
applied to both federal and state funded ACLS programs. This approach reduced cuts to 2 percent
across the board including all instructional programs, SABES, the DOE/ACLS administration
budget, etc. ACLS left it up to individual programs how to apply their cuts.
What's Ahead
The work is not over. This year's budget process is likely to proceed more quickly, since it
is an election year. The Governor has filed her budget, which begins the FY 2003
budget process. In it, she proposes that DOE/ABE receive $32 million -- a $2.5 million increase.
She also proposes a $2.5 million appropriation for ABE services at Community College
developmental education programs. Once the House and Senate craft their budgets, they will go
to the conference committee for a vote, then to Governor Swift for approval and/or vetoes.
The ABE community must continue its vigilance on budget issues. It's important to
continue to educate elected officials about the value and integrity of the services we provide.
Proactively, that means using media coverage whenever we can to highlight our students and
their successes. Without strong and continual advocacy, the visibility of ABE and the needs of
our students will inevitably be diminished.
Implications
The necessity for strong educational outreach and advocacy for our students has never been
clearer. It's a good time to reflect on what it means to work within an educational arena whose
students are marginalized from public discourse. Our students are immigrants, the working poor,
single mothers on public assistance, refugees, high school drop-outs. Part of our job
responsibilities must, therefore, involve political action -- that is, making sure that the work in
ABE is visible, valued, and sufficiently funded so we can continue to do our work and students
can continue to get the services they deserve. We need to prepare ourselves to again roll up our
sleeves and work in solidarity for continued success.
Lenore Balliro, the editor of Field Notes, has worked in the ABE field for over 18 years.
|